Various Ethical Non Ethical Issues Arisingâ€Myassignmenthelp.Com

Questions: What's going on? What are the facts? What are the issues (non-ethical)? Who is affected? What are the ethical issues and their implications? What can be done about it? What are the options? Which option is the best and why? Answers: Introduction The ethics and values in the business organization is an important part for the success of the organization in the market. Various ethics and values are provided in the business strategic planning of the success of the company in the market. The business ethics consists of the code of ethics and Doing Ethics Techniques that helps in maintaining the ethical issues in the business organization. This report contains a number of questions under DET that are answered. These questions helps in proper analyzing of the ethical issues in the organization. This report outlines the various aspects of the DET that helps in understanding the ethical issues in the business organization. The Doing Ethics Technique in the case study 1 has been done below. The DET is a technique that helps in analyzing the ethical issues in the given case scenario. 1.In the given case scenario, a quality assurance group has decided to deliver the system without performing testing on it. The QA group trust the customers and the development team regarding the development of the system. Therefore, they are not dong the quality testing in it. Therefore, the customers being fooled of not testing the system ordered (Miguel 2014). The Customer have to be informed by the company regarding the absence of testing of the system. 2.As commented by Mannay and Morgan (2015), the quality assurance group of a company is signing off a system without the testing process. The person complaining about this can be customer, development team, team leader and QA group. The facts regarding the case study includes to inform the customers about the incident in the company. The QA group has trust in its customer and development team regarding the project done by them. As mentioned by Black (2013), the testing of the project is an important part for the successful implementation of the project in the market. In case of the failure of the project, the company is liable for the recovering the project and deliver it successfully to the customer. As suggested by Bell (2014), the team leader is responsible for analyzing the progress of the project under the team. Therefore, the developing team have to contact to the respective team leader for discussing their queries regarding the project. 3.As stated by Coghlan and Brannick (2014), there are various non-ethical issues in the case scenario that points to the maintenance of the system in the company. The company might be in trouble due to the bad behavior of the QA testing team of the company. The customers is being fooled by the QA group by providing the system without testing it. This can be harmful for the customers and any type of damage can occur. As commented by Wong (2016), the team leader is responsible fir the development of the product in the market. Any error in the project might led to the congestion in the relationship of the company with the customer. As commented by Mannay and Morgan (2015), these issues are handled by the stakeholders of the company and they maintain development team for enhancing the quality of the product and services in the market (Mehta 2016). The company might tell the customer about the situation of delivery of project without testing. There might be a non-ethical by telling the cu stomer about the scenario. As mentioned by Spielthenner (2017), the customer might be dissatisfy by the act of the company by signing off the project without testing it. 4.In the given scenario, the customer is the person who is mostly affected by this act of the company. As commented by Mintz (2016), the QA group of the company have trust on the customer in the market and development team. The development team of the company is responsible for the development of the project. Therefore, the development team is affected by assigning the testing process of the project. As mentioned by Barroso (2016), this extra burden of testing is affecting the development team. The QA group is not ready to perform the testing of the project in the company. This is affecting the quality of the project that is delivered to the company. Therefore, the brand image of the company in the market might be decreased with the poor quality of the project. As commeneted by Millar (2016), the team leader is also affected due to extra pressure of the team of testing the project after developing the project. Therefore, the team leader have to manage the team for initiating the test ing of the project in the company. The customer in the market is affected due to the problem in the project as tested by the developing team of the company. 5.The ethical issues of the case scenario are related to the view of the development team and the Quality Assurance group. As mentioned by Wachs (2017), the Quality Assurance group is made for only performing the testing of the project and analyses the quality of it. They have ICTs that helps in testing purpose of the project in the market. The developing team is responsible for developing the project within deadline. Therefore, both the department have different roles to perform. In the case, the development team performs the testing process; there might be some gas in the testing process. As stated by Coghlan and Brannick (2014), this might decrease the quality of the project in the market. The customer might be dissatisfied with the work of the company. Therefore, these issues might cause a problem for the company in the market. The QA is responsible for performing the testing of the project developed by the developing team. 6.The ethical and non-ethical issues discussed in the case scenario can be mitigated in various ways. The team leader of the company might take a stand and ask the QA group for testing the project in the company The team leader report to the concerning stakeholder of the company regarding tis matter and pressurize the QA group to perform the testing of the project. As stated by Coghlan and Brannick (2014), the team leader or the development team might tell the customer about the fact of not testing the system. The customer might take appropriate step to mitigate the problems prevailing in the company. As commented by Mannay and Morgan (2015), there may be some legal action taken against the QA group for not signing off the system without the testing the project. This might create a hovering moment for the QA group and perform the testing of the project in the company. 7.The options in the company regarding the testing purpose of the project is maintained by the Quality Assurance group of the company The QA group have to test the system for analyzing the quality of the product developed by the development team. The negligence of the QA group can be resolved by telling the customer about the scenario. As commented by Mannay and Morgan (2015), the customer might take steps according to the condition. The team leader might pressurize the QA group that helps in maintaining the quality process of the project. 8.The best option is the team leader pressurizing the QA group maintaining the testing process of the project. The team leader can have a word with the QA group for performing the testing process of the project in the company. As stated by Coghlan and Brannick (2014), the team leader have to be informed about the testing process of the project in the company. In the case, the development team performs the testing process; there might be some gas in the testing process. This might decrease the quality of the project in the market. The customer might be dissatisfied with the work of the company. The development team of the company have to maintain the proper developing strategy for the project to be completed on time. As commented by Mannay and Morgan (2015), this helps in maintaining a good relationship with the customer in the market. Conclusion It can be concluded that the doing ethics technique helps in maintaining the proper ethical values in the company. In the given case scenario, the QA group have to perform the testing process of the project in the company. The various ethical and non-ethical issues are discussed in the report. There are various options for the solution of these issues have been provided in the report. The best option from the available solution has been mentioned in the report. The best solution includes the conversation of team leader with the quality assurance group of the company. It helps in maintaining the ethical consideration of the company and allow the QA group to perform their task in the company. References Barroso, P.M., 2016. 16 Advertising Ethics.Explorations in Critical Studies of Advertising,97, p.221. Bell, J., 2014.Doing Your Research Project: A guide for first-time researchers. McGraw-Hill Education (UK). Black, J., 2013.Mixed news: The public/civic/communitarian journalism debate. Routledge. Coghlan, D. and Brannick, T., 2014.Doing action research in your own organization. Sage. Mannay, D. and Morgan, M., 2015. Doing ethnography or applying a qualitative technique? Reflections from the waiting field.Qualitative Research,15(2), pp.166-182. Mehta, L., 2016. Ethics tries handling inner conflicts scientifically/spiritually. Miguel, A., 2014.Doing Christian Ethics from the Margins: Revised and Expanded. Orbis Books. Millar, J., 2016. An Ethics Evaluation Tool for Automating Ethical Decision-Making in Robots and Self-Driving Cars.Applied Artificial Intelligence,30(8), pp.787-809. Mintz, S., 2016. Giving voice to values: A new approach to accounting ethics education.Global Perspectives on Accounting Education,13, pp.37-50. Spielthenner, G., 2017. The Principle-Based Method of Practical Ethics.Health Care Analysis,25(3), pp.275-289. Wachs, M. ed., 2017.Ethics in planning. Routledge. Wong, D.J.N., 2016. Training in the ethics of audit, quality improvement and research.Anaesthesia,71(9), pp.1113-1114.